[1995. To Gy]
“Then I realized that there was an infinite variety in women as people…and that sex was the most direct route to knowing a woman…a route they like, one that we like, and often the only route that can break down the barriers and permit close acquaintance (…) Each woman was a unique individual worth knowing, and, if we took time enough, we might find we loved each other. But at least we offered each other pleasure and a haven from cares” -
Robert Heinlein, “Time Enough for Love”.
“Mamma, look at the clouds, it’s a hurricane. The hurricane is awake and hungry and thirsty, and so he will eat the clouds that are full of rain, but then he will die, because he ate the clouds” (G on the way to school this morning).
It is a stormy morning. The youth of Waffleland sit, arms folded, morosely fixing their gazes into the void which passes for privacy on the plastic seats of the bus, brain stimulators switched on, competing with one another in a cacophony of tinny drum beats. Closing out the hostile world. Conformism is non-conformity. The wind tried to wrench my umbrella out of my hand, straining the spokes, but I managed to keep hold as I stepped inside. A man in his late twenties clad in the urban uniform of the student, dark green combat jacket and black woolly hat blew a surreptitious kiss to his girlfriend as she waved to him from across the road. Such tight embraces for but a few hours’ separation.
Saturday night in old London town. The library visit was not successful, since what I was looking for had been taken out on loan. Once I found something, I could forget the discomfort and lack of belonging that always tingles down the nape of my neck for the first few moments, disappearing into the page. C wanted to go to a Chinese restaurant, selecting the most downbeat in the entire street: “I go for atmosphere rather than style. You usually find better food in places that don’t tart themselves up”.
She had steamed sea bass, insisting that she was a vegetarian (had I still been one, I would doubtless have fallen out with her. It is not nearly ascetic enough to savour the fruits of the salt waters).
Her trip to the capital was motivated by a quest for knowledge. She was afraid I would ridicule her if she were to recount her activities in further detail: “You can keep a secret, can’t you, F?”
Precious from her whose indiscretion had destroyed my relationship with A through divulging to the group a comment he had made. I sighed. She talked. She has become involved with a meditation group led by “spirit channelers”, whose leader, when she goes into a trance, is taken over by Joseph of Aramathea and who can answer any question one might care to ask. She has one week to make up her mind whether to join them and explore her channelling abilities or forever leave them. My residual Christian prejudices balked at this “Satanism”, this “demon worship”, but I listened. The medium cannot recall a single word she has said afterwards, so every utterance is recorded and a transcript sent to the questioner to peruse at leisure. Most of the work of the meditation group involves the study of these transcripts plus a lot of prayer to ward off natural disasters, since they are Gaianists, believing that our violence, cruelty and negative energy are prompting the planet to retaliate. They claim to have saved many lives already with their preventive supplications. I did not dismiss anything she said, but took it seriously as an indication of a thirst for knowledge and who am I to ridicule such a search? I informed her that we were both acting on a similar impulse, choosing different methods to achieve fulfilment and generate meaning. She was less tolerant of me than I of her, brushing aside the utility of books as a source, to which I replied that the mystics of this world have always sought more direct forms of enlightenment, a term to which she strongly objected until I explained that I meant purpose, meaning rather than nirvana, and that I agreed with her that reason has its frustrations and limitations. Why bother with second-hand renditions when you can hear it all direct from someone who was there?
The she told me a little about her past lives. She has had several in Egypt (my impression being that in the New Age circuit you have zero credibility unless you have had at least one past life in those desert climes), including one as a priestess at Karnak. I smiled, jesting that I am firmly convinced that I have had one past life as a Hungarian; otherwise I cannot remotely begin to account for the affinity I feel towards the people and language.
“I wonder what La D will go down in history as this time?” she laughed.
“Oh, I’m sure I will be lost without trace, C, a drop of dew that will evaporate in the dawn light and be forgotten”.
What had convinced her of the veracity of the claims is that she recently had a skating accident that damaged her knee and so consulted Joseph on this, him having been a doctor and all.
“What should I do about my knee?”
A detailed reply about the precise nature of her injury followed, along with instructions about how it could be remedied, the medium not having any inkling about the existence of the problem, the answer given without the slightest hesitation.
Her face shone, she expected a response. All I could do was mutter a few platitudes about some people possessing greater intuition than others, that their sensitivity allows them to diagnose the malaises of the soul and that they have a long tradition of shamans and healers from whom to borrow a ritualistic form of presentation. I am not unkind. She ended up happier, with her mind at ease, I having reassured her that she was not insane and that she must follow whatever path to contentment she can find.
After dinner, I seduced her into accompanying me to Prêt for a dessert. I was overwhelmed by a craving for chocolate which still rages through my system! However, no respite was at ahnd, as all they had left was coffee and walnut cake, a poor second, which I nevertheless consumed – my need was so strong. During this less spiritual chat, the subject turned to JMCD – will I ever be free of him? That weekend, our last weekend, JMCD and I had gone to that very branch of Prêt, by the Albery, with D before the performance of “Uncle Vanya”. C prefaced her remarks with the customary: “I probably shouldn’t say this, but…” giving me the benefit of her considered opinion. He was, to quote her, a wanker, because, whilst we were together, he played on my insecurity, constantly making me prove myself, making me feel so much less than him, whereas the opposite was true. That I writhed around in desperation attempting to show that I was not inadequate. Although I might have felt completely inadequate it was only his inadequacy that was obvious to all. Do you know that in the course of our relationship I broke three telephones in sheer rage? I would smash them to the floor in impotent anger at his betrayals. The present telephone almost became number four, but miraculously survived! I look back and the hours and hours of waiting, the tears, the grief are what come to mind first. My life was a libation, my energy and, worse, my love, my essence poured endlessly on to the thirsty sand, to no avail. For weeks I would wait, shunning all for the sake of a few moments’ conversation that mostly never happened. At the time, the sacrifice was willingly made. Just as well that I have escaped…
“A short, fat dumpy woman, whom I’d loved for five years. I went out with her in the end, for three weeks. Five years and three weeks, frightening, isn’t it?”
Overheard on the Eurostar. Spoken by a relatively young, successful and to the exes of the world, handsome man, whose equally beautiful, well-attired and skinny wife (expecting twins, as she beamed to her friends) worshipped him from the seat opposite. I have strengthened. I can meet their scorn for the likes of me with scorn in equal measure. After they had been chivvied back to their seats by the purser, I wept. My fertility is preying on my mind. We were delayed for an hour and fifteen minutes, so I had plenty of opportunity to sift through my feelings. I was very tired, my guard was down, as you put it. What follows is what I noted down on the train. Eine Momentaufnahme about something deep and fundamental, which should not be seen as a threat.
Yes, the offer I made in the “Interlude” was a heartfelt one, though, had I been a manipulative and calculating being, I would have held fire with it until much later [to pay for sex selection of an embryo to be implanted with the aim of providing him with the male child he so ardently craved – Chameleon]. JMCD would have labelled it a “serious tactical error”. However, since there are no tactics, there is no campaign, it does not matter. I know why I protested about responsibility so vehemently. Men hate responsibility (so do women: The reason I laughed so heartily at your anecdote about the girl who would have fucked you if you had poured her more g and t was that I recognised a loathing of blame and potential for self-recrimination there that I empathise with to an extent). It was intended to reassure you that I am not setting a trap with an heir as the bait. What you said about ten years hence is perfectly valid. I cannot argue with that except to say that such a statement is true of any child conceived in any form of relationship. The risk is greater here, but it is not negligible in a different set up, and for that reason I reject it. I am willing to assume the burden, the penalties and woes without wishing to inflict them on anyone else. There are many consequences to such a choice, of which I could not be aware last time round, but of which I am only too aware now, which is to say that I do not make such an offer lightly. THAK would disappear for a start. No more psychological props, no more fantasies about being rescued from the dire state of spinsterhood by the Great Artist. More struggle against the accursed Waffleians. More official stigma and disapproval, more interference from nosey-parker social workers, less freedom, longer confinement. On the other hand, I now have all the benefits of the protection of my employers. They pay for my hospital stay, I would even have time off that I never had before. All the benefits and no opportunity. In one way, I have nothing left to lose; I have lost it all already.
After we made our agreement, JMCD refused to take the slightest risk, calculating to the minute when I was ovulating, when he had to put on a condom. When we were fucking, I would never be sure whether he would remember when I was safe and when not. He would always hide a rubber under the pillow when I wasn’t there and, just as he was about to come, pull it out, slip it on and finish what he had started. Fair enough, I hate Johnnys too. But it was the way that he did it. Being used. I respected him, I did his bidding. I complied, believing that he would eventually relent and leave her, that if he were compelled by events to choose between her and me he could not be so base as to abandon me. How often did I soak the pillow whilst he snored. (JMCD conked out immediately after ejaculation, sometimes falling asleep on top of me, almost suffocating me). He never let me know in advance that he had no intention of granting me my wish, leaving me to speculate whilst giving him the internal massage he enjoyed so much. Had he made it clear in advance, it would not have soiled me so. What galled me more than anything else in those days was the easy fertility of Liz. A slip of paper, a contract permitting her to realise her maternal ambitions, my lack of a certificate denying me the right to mine. She bore him four children. His longest standing mistress, my immediate predecessor, his secretary at Stewart’s in D, had a daughter by him. Her life had been hard, married to a man who beat her so severely that (she claimed, though I insisted to JMCD that she was lying to him in a bid to snare him, as she had a second child by her new husband later) she was told by the doctors that she could not have children. They never used contraception. He knew something was wrong when, after eight years and the child, she failed to contact him after going on a coaching holiday he had funded for them. She married the bus driver a few weeks later. The only unique feature of my relationship with JMCD is that I didn’t dump him, he dumped me! How could it be true that he loved me, that I meant anything to him when these other women had given him children whereas he refused to impregnate me? It was very hard. Ergo, I didn’t mean anything at all. That was my reasoning. What is it about me that makes me so unsuitable, so undeserving? What is it about them that makes them so much better? Nothing could allay this, nothing assuage my thirst for an answer. Grist to his mill, allowing any amount of influence. Small wonder I had to prove myself, again and again and again. Ultimately I want to mean something to any man I care about. Particularly if I fuck them. Particularly if I open up to them.
Another M. This time G’s father, Manfred. I would never have become entangled with him sexually had it not been for my experience with Dan. He had sat in the same library in the University of K when I was there for my year abroad as an undergraduate and was still there when I returned as a postgraduate. I never felt any passion for him. Sure, we fucked. He had only had one girlfriend prior to me (he was 30-something when we first met). What I liked about him was that he was the first man I had met who didn’t have some sort of hang-up about sex, who wasn’t embarrassed about it or ashamed/self-conscious about himself or engrossed in abuse or kinky practices. The Rigsarkivet in Copenhagen attracts the most way out types! He took delight in sex in a most uncomplicated way. A revelation. A boost in my darkest hour. (As if that weren’t enough, he was also the only Marxist I’ve ever fucked! Sandal-wearing member of the anti-sports and anti-car leagues). Manfred loved me and, when I finally allowed him to see G, he adored his son. When he came visiting me in Denmark during my pregnancy, I panicked. I was not ready for commitment (I gave birth in Scotland. On leaving Copenhagen, I did not supply him with my new address. Despicable and cowardly, I know). “Wir werden Eltern” was the title of the foetal development book he brought with him. Clinching it. I knew I could not go through with it, my stomach churning at the mere thought. Even though his atheism and cynicism made him an avowed enemy of the institution of marriage, he would still have wanted to live with me. There I was, up to the eyeballs in debt, with a half-finished thesis, having achieved zilch. His instinctive reaction on the phone when I informed him of my state was simply to say: “Ach, Scheisse”.
He soon came round to the idea, however and I was terrified that he would try to use German law to win custody of G, so I hinted at THAK that he might be the father (there had been a certain amount of overlap) in order to have him own up to the deed at the Registrar’s, putting paid to any leverage Manfred might have enjoyed. It haunts me to this day. If anything happens to me, by accident or design, THAK gets G. I must do something about this. In passing, I have nothing against the father having a say in the upbringing of a child. Manfred decided to turn his back on G. I never prevented him from visiting whenever he wanted. I put the foot down over him bringing his new girlfriend with him, arguing that G already has a mother and that I would not tolerate having my position usurped, although in reality I couldn’t stick the idea of them having sex under my roof whilst I was rotting away in unwanted celibacy. Not that I actually wanted to screw Manfred by that stage. Furthermore, I never took a penny from him. Nor from THAK. G and Manfred are separate concepts in my mind. To be blunt: the one has nothing to do with the other. In one respect, G is the result of my complete despair, a fleshly being to bind me to life, whether I like it or not.
I could not have THAK’s child. Even now, when he is not my “fasztartalék”, as you brilliantly punned, I still meet him without G. He came to visit in the early days, when he still harboured an illusion that I might invite him to move to Waffleland. He was always highly ambivalent towards G, my fault, as I rebuffed all attempts to interrogate me as to the real father. It never seemed worth bothering about. The acting father versus the biological was to me a superfluous distinction. To vent his disappointment and resentment at me for my sexual adventures (he even knows about H, but still grimly clings to me), he spends a great deal of our shared time reeling off the list of past transgressions on my part. After all, he has never fucked anyone else, he is as pure as the driven snow and I am a damned harlot. Accusation, recrimination. Then he wonders that I can sleep next to him without touching him, without indicating the least stirring of desire. You know, in January of this year, he asked me again whether G is his, and I spelled it out for him: NO, NO. When G was but a few months old I was exhausted and did not have the energy to bath him. THAK had been simmering with barely concealed wrath all day, pretending to watch a black and white war film he was not remotely interested in (he loathes the genre) purely to spite me. I begged him to help give G a bath. Flinging the remote control on to the carpet, he stormed through to the bathroom and repeatedly submerged G to stop him from crying (babies being, as you know, extremely sensitive to mood and tension). He almost drowned G. I was livid, yet powerless. Although I had to physically fight THAK to rescue my son, so hopeless did I feel about the prospects of replacing THAK with anyone else that I bit my arm in the back room as I tried to comfort G. Far from sending THAK packing on the spot, I apologised instead, abasing myself. THAK cannot pick on someone his own size, someone capable of self-defence. In fact, THAK took sadistic pleasure in taking out his suppressed frustrations over me on G. I instructed Shilamat never to leave them alone together. Really, had I believed for an instant that I could find a partner, I would have put an end to our association, but I was frightened, weak and pathetic. THAK is malicious by nature. He would smash G’s constructions in blocks, gloating at his “lack of imagination”, cursing him for shamming distress, for manipulating me. It was intolerable, yet I put up with it. Worse: I allowed my child to be exposed to it. THAK was mortally jealous of the attention I lavished on my offspring and was desperate to regain my interest.
I believed, on making the decision to become a single parent, that having a baby would obliterate my desires and raging needs. How naïve. It proved as wrong as my earlier assumption about age calming the beast. I am confident that I can raise my son well. I acknowledge, though, that I am fortunate to have such an easy-going boy, a bright child with a sense of humour.
My new self-definition depends very much on you. How precarious my hopes, how intangible my dreams. How dissociated/dislocated from my present surroundings I still feel. Now I can take them or leave them, which is an improvement. The odds are against me. In life. I am not a vindictive personality. I am deeply saddened that Manfred has turned his back on his son, unfortunate though his experience has been. I am certain that he has become a father again, by the girlfriend who has lived with him ever since we split (she was 18 at the time). Now I could withstand the contact. I have no intention of concealing from G who his father is. What has become abundantly clear is that a great deal of understanding, kindness and delicacy is required in these situations if the tie is not to be curdled with rancour. I am embittered by my experience with M. I am also embittered by my experiences in Waffleland. I would dearly like to have another child. What a confirmation it would be to me to have yours, perpetuating your line, you who are the measure of all things. Even if it doesn’t last. (How reminiscent of Gaffe in “Blade Runner”: “It’s too bad she won’t live”. Scott regretted the imposition of the happy ending so much that he tried to restore what he saw as a loss of credibility by editing it out in the Director’s Cut. It impoverishes the film immensely, leaves too many loose ends, although the first time you see it, I admit, the original ending grates. Having seen it so often before the Scott-approved version, I reckon the moguls were right for once, but you can make up your own mind). You have already responded to this, in the “Interlude”. I hadn’t realised, until sitting, blowing my nose into the napkin, that it was opening up such a personal can of worms for me, or, if you prefer, reopening wounds that have barely begun to scar over. I am not going back on my offer, though.
One final thought in passing. You confessed that what made you stick it out with Katryn was pride. You thought you could convert her. Is there an echo here? Can I be redeemed? You know I love you.